What you asked: What is being done to ensure there is no discrimination in assessments for students with declared disabilities? Currently my experience has been ableist and often the expectations from markers do not consider reasonable adjustments.
What they said:
Our EDI (Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion) team closely monitors inclusive learning within the curriculum. Their responsibilities include inspecting curriculum content and reviewing feedback provided on various programmes. Their work alongside student feedback (informally and through the complaints process) offers valuable insights into areas where we need to change our approach.
Additionally, we must ensure that reasonable adjustments are considered during the marking process. This is considered during the moderation and external examining processes, where the team's role is to ensure that our procedures are fair and transparent while providing tailored support for all students.
We also have an ‘Abrahart working group’ that are looking at the whole student experience with a view to producing a set of principles that will guide the teaching staff to address student support through teaching, assessment and reasonable adjustments.
What you asked: What further work can be done to ensure students get their feedback and grades in a timely manner to improve in their next assessment?
What they said:
Through the Education Committee we have proposed to offer different assessment approaches. For example, in some of the distance learning programmes we have integrated student online forums/discussion boards as part of an accumulative approach to the final assessment. It means what you write during the learning process becomes part of the end summative assessment. This means tutors will be able to provide timely feedback more frequently than just at the end of the module.
Furthermore, we are developing a new personal tutoring system to assist students gain feedback and support from their tutors.
What you asked: Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been mentioned multiple times to suggest that it is being used by the university, what measures are being considered to ensure students aren't negatively impacted by AI checks as well as to reduce academic misconduct cases?
What they said:
Arden University is deeply interested in Artificial Intelligence, and we are developing a strategy on how to incorporate AI into the student experience and prepare students for its use in employment settings.
To understand the best ways to utilise AI, we have been engaging with students, staff, employers, and local regional mayoral sectors. This information has helped us establish AI Acentus, a sub-committee of the Research Committee. We have created an AI strategy that encourages students to access the incubator hub and learn more about integrating AI into their project work.
As a result, we have authored a new statement on the use of artificial intelligence in assessments to guide students on when and when not to use AI in their studies. This policy aims to prevent any instances of academic misconduct. Our intention is to provide students with the correct information to use AI ethically and to help them enhance their skills and development.
What you asked: Students with learning differences and reasonable adjustments can sometimes require assistive technology provided by DSA. These have integrated Artificial Intelligence technologies and have in the past affected student submissions as they were flagged for academic misconduct. Are there any steps being taken to reduce such instances by the university and will this be addressed in a statement or policy to support or guide students as well as staff?
What they said:
Yes, our goal is to use our understanding of AI in a positive manner that supports and encourages student success. Our new AI policy will outline the ethical use of AI, detailing when and how it should be used.
What you asked: Are there any plans to reevaluate library resources any time soon and will there be further investments made into Kortext? In my experience, the current digital library, Kortext, does not allow a quality audiobook function for disabled students, because it can only be used by highlighting a few sentences at a time and reading those, making the process really challenging.
What they said:
Yes, we plan to re-evaluate our library resources to better meet the needs of our students. Our EDI (Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion) team are currently reviewing the resources and their support for all students.
What you asked: Before we had e: Vision, we released modules via iLearn and could use a button to defer a module without evidence using that system. Since the transition to e:vision, we have to apply for deferrals through extenuating circumstances, and it has been implied that deferrals without evidence will no longer be allowed moving forward. Please could we have some clarification on why this decision was made?
What they said:
Evidence for deferrals through extenuating circumstances (EC) was suspended during the pandemic to ease the circumstances for all students – particularly those in caring professions whose lives and work were seriously disrupted when the pandemic hit. The University appears to have forgot to revert to the correct policy (evidence required) once the pandemic lifted!
The introduction of our new Student Information System re-introduced some standard processes such as the requirement of evidence for ECs. We apologise for this, but it is important (in fact, essential) for a university to keep students progressing in their studies. Automatic acceptance of ECs does not help with that goal. Naturally where students have a clear need for ECs it will continue to be supported but you will need to supply reasonable evidence to do so.